The opening two lines of my recently published novel, Mrs. McPhealy's American, read thus: "Every village has its idiot. Locharbert in Scotland had three."
Now readers seem to have one of two reactions to this. On the one hand, people will tell me, "You had me in the first two lines!" These readers think this is a funny observation. On the other hand are the readers who are offended that I would make reference to "idiots" at all. These readers dismiss the book before they have even started. Claire McDougall, author, is to be relegated to Coventry, a highly occupied zone these days. So, let me give my defence for opening my book this way.
First of all, I am not pulling the notion of a village idiot out of thin air. It's an age-old concept. From time to time, I see someone wearing a T-shirt that has the following written across the chest; Your village called. They are missing their idiot. I find that mildly offensive, I have to admit. It is distasteful because the intention there is to cut another down. However, it is made in jest. It is teasing, not something used much in American culture. When I first came to the USA, I would "tease" someone, only for that person to take what I had said as a serious accusation. For instance, to a woman concerning her overbearing husband, I might say, "Don't forget to put the arsenic in his tea." I could easily say this in front of him, because it is said as a joke, and that's what jokes are for. All jokes hold an element of truth, otherwise they wouldn't be funny. The jester to the kings and queens of old fulfilled this function: nudging a person in power towards a truth through the vehicle of laughter is a vital role. something we could surely use these days in this climate of deadly serious and polarising politics.
When I handed the script for Mrs. McPhealy's American to one editor, she warned me that some readers might find this opening reference to idiots unacceptable. I refused to take it out, however, because I don't see it that way. But to appease her, I quickly followed those two lines with a phrase that rebranded these three idiots as sages. Anyone who has gone to the trouble of actually reading my novel, cannot come away with the feeling that my aim was to denigrate these three brothers in a small Scottish town. On the contrary, these characters are my Greek chorus. It is they who know what is really going on in the town. All the history and undercurrent of the town has filtered down into these three, and I use them to tell the reader what is really so, especially when appearances would suggest otherwise. In other words, they are a literary device. And I use the well worn metaphor of a village idiot to set it in place.
There you have it. As with so much of the cancel culture we live in, it helps to widen the lense and not throw out the baby with the bath water, to use another metaphor. In my own country, I have this problem with women who won't countenance the great Scottish poet Robert Burns anymore, because he was a fabled womaniser with a slew of illegitimate children who once penned the memorable line about "fucking [a woman] until she rejoiced." Harvey Weinstein, his accusers bellow! No, I say quietly. The man was born in the mid-eighteenth century. Largely because of Christianity, women at the time had little agency. Robert Burns gave them them some. I wouldn't have wanted to be married to the man, but he also wrote this beautiful line, "but to see her is to love her, and love but her forever; her nature made her what she is and never made another." Again, the context matters. I'll be the first to admit that Burns had his flaws, though he was not a fraud, but if we were to dismiss him for not fitting into the mores of toady, we would rob history (more particularly Scottish history) of some great literature. And it's not as though we are incapable of balancing two contradictory impressions.
To get back to Mrs. McPhealy and the idiots. They shall remain, because they represent this point. They may be lacking in what scholars would regard as intelligence, but my precise point is that there is more to a human than his or her IQ score. As I have written in other books, that kind of intelligence is highly overrated and has got humanity into some serious pickles. The quiet knowing that I write about in my book is far more the measure of the man. And definitely more the measure of the woman.